Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!

How It Works
Order Now
glass
pen
clip
papers
heaphones

SC 270 Herzing University Wk 3 Environmental Literacy Plan Paper

Health Medical, SC 270

Health Medical, SC 270

SC 270 Herzing University Wk 3 Environmental Literacy Plan Paper

Unit 3 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase III

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 85
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Evaluation Title: Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase III

This week you will add to your Environmental Literacy Plan information about climate change and NIMBY in your community. You will need to explore your community and take a few pictures to include in your plan.

Discuss:

  • What are the main impacts of climate change?
  • What can the community do to slow down the effects of climate change?
  • Find three (3) news articles about climate change within the last two years. Summarize the articles and their impact. Cite and reference the articles in APA on the References page of the document.
  • Find a lake, pond, or river in your community. Take a picture of its conditions. Is there any pollution? Do you see any wildlife present? Is the water level high or low?
  • Explain NIMBY. What evidence of NIMBY is present in your community? Where are the water treatment plant, landfills, or power plant located?

Format this information using the template provided or create your own template. You may also modify the template layout as long as it meets all of the assignment requirements.

Validate your statements and opinions with supporting evidence (citations and references) in APA form.

Submit:

  • Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase III for your community (PDF or Word document)

Estimated time to complete: 5 hours

Assignment Files

Environmental Literacy Plan Template – Phase III [Word Document]

Rubric

SC270 Unit 3 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase III

SC270 Unit 3 Assessment – Environmental Literacy Plan – Phase III
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentSC270-CO3
25.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

 23.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

 21.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
25.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 23.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 21.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
17.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

 15.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

 14.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

 12.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

 11.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

17.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
13.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 11.5 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 10.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

 9.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 7.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

13.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

 4.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

 3.0 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

 2.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

 1.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

PreviousNext

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: School Assignment only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by School Assignment are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. School Assignment is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At School Assignment, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Menu
Free resources
 
Dissertation help
 
Email
support@writeship.com
Schoolassignment.blog ©2023 All rights reserved. Terms of use | Privacy Policy